Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Balestra

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 29, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Convicted by a jury on a charge of vehicular homicide (G. L. c. 90, § 24G, as in effect prior to St. 1982, c. 373, § 9), the defendant on appeal claims error in the denial of her motion for a required finding of not guilty, the denial of her substitute motion to take a polygraph examination, and the exclusion of certain evidence contained in police reports. We affirm.

1. Motion for required finding of not guilty. Taken in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the evidence that the defendant was the driver of the automobile (the only element of the offense challenged on appeal) was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Julian v. RandazzoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Whipple v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FultonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API