Legal Opinion
Stebbins v. Polano
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 28, 2023No. 4:21-cv-04184Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID A. STEBBINS, Case No. 21-cv-04184-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. RECONSIDERATION AND RECUSAL AND DENYING MOTION FOR 10 KARL POLANO, et al., RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 159, 162, 165 11 12 13 Now before the Court for consideration are the motion for reconsideration and recusal and 14 motion for relief from judgment filed by Plaintiff David Stebbins (“Plaintiff”). The Court has 15 considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Curtis B. Danning, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Fenton, Lavine & Co., a Partnership v. Beau Berlinski LavineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.