Legal Opinion

Candace Lee Moe v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 25, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02833Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CANDACE LEE MOE, Case No. 2:25-cv-2833-JDP (SS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 18 (“Commissioner”) denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance 19 benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. Both parties have moved for summary 20 judgment. ECF Nos. 10 & 12. For the reasons discussed below, the court grants…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API