Legal Opinion

Eckley v. Seese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1955No. Appeals, 183 and 184PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Bell,

The sole question in this case is whether defendant is entitled to a judgment non obstante veredicto.

Darel Eckley, 3 1/2 years old, was killed in a heartrending accident. At approximately 8:30 o’clock p.m., daylight saving time, on May 29, 1952, Mr. Eckley was driving his automobile on a concrete paved highway (18 feet wide) known as Route 209, in the Village of Brodheadsville, Monroe County, Pennsylvania. His wife was in the front seat of the four door sedan, Darel and his brother Dale, aged 8, were in the back ■seat of the car. * It was drizzling and the cars had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haddigan v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Greene v. FlewellingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Carter v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Akiko Buxhoeveden, Administratrix of the Estate of Theodore v. Buxhoeveden, Deceased v. B & P Motor Express, Inc. And Chester T. BelbackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Thomas v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API