Legal Opinion
State v. Hartford
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 2015No. 2014-KA-0643PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.
hThe defendants/appellants, Timothy Hartford (“Hartford”) and Joshua Hogan (“Hogan”) (collectively, “the defendants”), appeal their convictions for attempted looting during a state of emergency, a violation of La. R.S. 14:62.5 C. After a review of the law and evidence, for the reasons that follow, we affirm their convictions and sentences.
On 4 October 2012, Hartford and Hogan were charged by a bill of information with one count of looting during a state of emergency.1 The defendants pled not guilty at their 11 October 2012 arraignment. Following a preliminary hearing…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. DortheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- State v. SepulvadoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BarbainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Jonterry A. BernardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Jonterry A. BernardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Tervanthy a HudsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020