Legal Opinion
Ottawa (Vil.) v. Ohio Elec. Ry.
Ohio Circuit Courts
Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error.
1Opinion of the CourtHurin, P. J.
In this action the Village of Ottawa sued to recover from the Ohio Electric Ry. Company the sum of $364 for lighting street crossings.
The court of common pleas sustained a demurrer to the petition as not stating a cause of action.
The plaintiff not desiring to plead further brings the case into this court on error.
The Ohio Electric Ry. Company is an interurban electric railway company operating its cars by electricity on tracks through the village of Ottawa.
By Gen. Code 3762 it is provided that “When deemed necessary by the council of a municipality to have a * * * railway, located in whole or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. AnchorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Zehren v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Milwaukee, Racine & Kenosha Electric Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Diebold v. Kentucky Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lansdowne v. LansdowneOhio Court of Appeals · 1935