Nilsson v. Nilsson
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.
There are presented questions arising out of a husband-father’s breach of a separation agreement.
Upon the trial it was expressly conceded that the parties were duly married on November 2, 1942, and are still husband and wife; that petitioner and the child “Dorothy” (born January 12, 1935, and formally adopted in March, 1947) are each entitled to support on a means and separate maintenance basis under subdivision (1) of section 92 of the Domestic Relations Court Act of the City of New York; and that the sole remaining issue is the amount of “ fair and reasonable ” support “ as justice requires…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Young v. . ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Randolph v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- " Johnston " v. " Johnston "New York Family Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. SullivanNew York City Family Court · 1966
- Carole K v. Arnold KNew York Family Court · 1976
- Krochalis v. KrochalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Rottenberg v. RottenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1960