Legal Opinion

Mygatt v. M. Schaffer-Flaum Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided September 2, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by Otis A. Mygatt against the M. Schaffer-Flaum Company. On motion for preliminary injunction on United States patent 821,306 and design patent 37,983 for prismatic reflectors.

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The disposition of the design patent may be left to final hearing. As to the mechanical patent the defendant's affidavits are voluminous and the exhibits of prior art devices are very numerous. The conflicting testimony is largely scientific, and a safer conclusion on the whole case can best be reached at final hearing after cross-examination of the witnesses, and it would seem not difficult for defendant to introduce its testimony within a reasonably short time. The showing here made as to the prior art tends to the same conclusion as that expressed by Judge Hough in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. Wilcox Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mygatt v. M. Schaffer-Flaum Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API