Lee v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1DissentSamford, Judge
It is with considerable' reluctance that I find myself in disagreement with my associates as to the proper application of Supreme Court Rule 45 in this case. I am in agreement with the majority, that the refusal of the presiding judge to mark certain written charges, requested by the defendant, either given or refused as so presented, and to sign his ■ name thereto, constitutes error. All of the decisions cited by Judge RICE in the majority opinion hold to this view. The only point of difference between us lies in the fact that the majority holds to the view that as the charges are not a part…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Carroll v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.