Legal Opinion

Mississippi Limestone Corporation v. Burzynski

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided May 24, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00063Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION MISSISSIPPI LIMESTONE CORPORATION PLAINTIFF V. 3:24-CV-00063-BRW TIM BURZYNSKI, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment and to Strike Answer (Doc. No. 9). According to the affidavits in the record, both Defendants were served on April 16, 2024.1 Defendants answered on May 21, 2024.2 “Entry of a default judgment . . . [is] committed to the sound discretion of the district court. Default judgments, however, are not favored by the law.”3 Here, Defendants’ answer was fourteen days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States of America, on Behalf of and for the Use of Time Equipment Rental & Sales, Inc. v. Gary L. Harre, Yancey Lamar AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. American States Insurance v. Technical Surfacing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API