Legal Opinion

People v. Candelario

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree. The transcript of the plea proceeding does not support the contention that defendant lacked the ability to understand the terms of the plea bargain or that his waiver of appeal was not knowingly made because he did not understand English. Thus, we conclude that defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal from those convictions.

Defendant also appeals from a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. MiddletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. NorwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. CandelarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. CandelarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. RomanNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API