Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Como Consolidated Mines Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1933No. 2981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

This case is before us on an appeal by Gurney Gordon, receiver of the respondent, from an order fixing his fee as such receiver and the fee of his attorneys, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The court ordered further that said receiver and his said attorneys prorate with all other creditors of the receivership. Appellant’s attorneys filed their opening briefs on the merits and served the same on the attorney for the respondent. A motion to dismiss the appeal was thereafter made. The motion was denied. 54 Nev. 440, 22 P. (2d) 127. As the time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLane v. Placerville & Sacramento Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Beckwith v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. St. Paul Title, Insurance & Trust Co. v. Diagonal Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Ball v. Improved Property Holding Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. Campbell v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parks v. Central Door & Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API