Legal Opinion

LightGuard Systems, Inc. v. Spot Devices, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 9, 2012No. 3:10-cv-00737-LRH (WGC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM G. COBB, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the court are two discovery disputes. The first concerns LightGuard Systems, Inc. (“LightGuard”) and Spot Devices, Inc.’s (“Spot”) dispute over whether certain documents are privileged (“privilege dispute”), which stems from LightGuard’s Emergency Motion to Compel. (Doe. # 74.)1 The second concerns LightGuard and Spot’s dispute regarding fees owed to a discovery vendor, which came before the court during a January 24, 2012, status conference. (Doc. # 118.)

I. BACKGROUND

The facts underlying LightGuard and Spot’s discovery disputes are…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. W Holding Co. v. Chartis InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  3. Dunsmore v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  4. Flynn v. LoveDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  5. Flynn v. LoveDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API