Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Dye

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1915No. 4695PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Atoka County; Baxter Taylor, Judge. Action by T. M. Dye against the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company.' Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This is a suit to recover for the alleged killing of a yearling. The plaintiff, at a trial of the cause on appeal to the county court, introduced evidence to show that the animal was found on the right-of-way injured in such a manner as to indicate that it had been struck by defendant company’s train, at or near the edge of the switch limits in the village of Ward-ville, at a point' about five telephone poles (one-sixth mile) from the depot.

Plaintiff was unable to produce any witness- to the facts and circumstances as regards the' manner of the injury. The defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Ft. Smith & W. Ry. Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WardCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. RainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API