United States v. Joseph A. Bellosi, A/K/A Joe Stanford
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellees have been charged with various criminal offenses relating to illegal gambling operations.1 Their indictment was based at least in part on evidence obtained through interception of telephone communications. Prior to trial appellees moved to have this evidence suppressed. The District Court granted their motion on the basis of 23 D.C.Code § 547 (1973) and 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (1970) which prescribe the procedure by which District of Columbia and United States law enforcement authorities may obtain requisite judicial authorization for interception of wire…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. Van HornCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- United States v. George M. Florea and Raymond Paul VaraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.