Legal Opinion

Pyatt v. Waldo

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 15, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

This is a suit brought to collect from the heirs of Sarah O. H. Waldo, deceased, the amount due on a bond made by her in her lifetime. Said-bond became due January 12, 1873. Said Sarah C. H. Waldo died in April, 1873. This action -was commenced in February, 1891. The only party now defending is Rhinelander Waldo, a grandson of Sarah C. H. Waldo. Said Sarah O. H. Waldo devised all her real estate to her two sons, Horace and Francis, so that said Francis took the same interest as he would have taken if there had been no will. Said Francis subsequently deceased, leaving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hauselt v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Buckley v. BuckleyNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Colgan v. DunneNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Chewett v. MoranU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1883
  5. Fink v. BergNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kerr v. SchremppAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API