Legal Opinion

Revenue Cabinet v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 17, 1987No. 86-CA-1763-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

The Revenue Cabinet appeals from a judgment of the Whitley Circuit Court holding that an inheritance tax on intangible personal property held by a co-owner or third-party beneficiary in a survivorship1 account or certificate is violative of both the United States Constitution and the Kentucky Constitution. This has the effect of rendering the Revenue Cabinet incapable of collecting such a tax under the provisions of KRS 140.010 and .050.

The facts underlying this matter were stipulated at the trial level. The matter concerns “at least $142,818.65 of intangible personal property…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Saylor v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Barton v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  4. Dubois Adm'r v. ShannonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Revenue Cabinet, Com. of Ky. v. SamaniCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API