Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Newcomb

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1923No. 17981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Hpon a trial to the court and a jury a verdict was rendered in favor of respondent for $500 damages, alleged to have been caused by a fire carelessly and negligently set out by one of the appellants on his own land. This award was allowed by the court to stand, after a motion for a new trial had been denied, and judgment rendered thereon. The trial court, in passing upon the motion for a new trial, tersely stated that it was denied upon the ground that setting a fire on July 17, in the middle of the summer was negligence, and the fire burning plaintiff’s property showed carelessness.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lehman v. Maryott & Spencer Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Arnhold v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958
  4. Mensik v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Semler v. Cook-Waite Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API