Legal Opinion

Tedford v. Divine

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1987No. 64106Published

1Opinion of the Court

734 P.2d 283 (1987)

Teddy Lee TEDFORD, Appellant,

v.

Howard DIVINE, Appellee.

No. 64106.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 3, 1987.

David A. Cotter, Broken Arrow, for appellant.

Best, Sharp, Thomas, Glass & Atkinson by Joseph A. Sharp and Lynn A. Summers, Tulsa, for appellee.

HODGES, Justice.

Teddy Lee Tedford (appellant/plaintiff) filed an action against Howard Divine (appellee/defendant) for damages sustained during an automobile accident allegedly caused by appellee's cows. Although a summons was personally served, appellee failed to answer the complaint within the statutory time period. On January…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. American Bank of Commerce v. ChavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Tedford v. DivineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Fellows v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API