Hemmerle v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DETERMINING TIMELINESS OF APPEAL
2Per curiam
While considering a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order awarding attorney’s fees, we asked the appellant to show cause why the appeal from final judgment should not be dismissed since his motion for new trial was not served within ten days of the directed verdict. If the motion for new trial was not timely served, it would not toll the time for taking the appeal, and we would not have jurisdiction. Casto v. Casto, 404 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1981).
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(b) provides that a motion for new trial shall be “served not later than…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Casto v. CastoSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Meus v. Eagle Family Discount Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4Cited by1 opinion
- Olga Vakulovska v. Sergii VakulovskyiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023