Legal Opinion

Hemmerle v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 1996No. 96-0288PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DETERMINING TIMELINESS OF APPEAL

2Per curiam

While considering a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order awarding attorney’s fees, we asked the appellant to show cause why the appeal from final judgment should not be dismissed since his motion for new trial was not served within ten days of the directed verdict. If the motion for new trial was not timely served, it would not toll the time for taking the appeal, and we would not have jurisdiction. Casto v. Casto, 404 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1981).

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(b) provides that a motion for new trial shall be “served not later than…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Casto v. CastoSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Meus v. Eagle Family Discount Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Olga Vakulovska v. Sergii VakulovskyiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API