Legal Opinion
Smith v. Education People, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 16, 2005No. 03-CV-1856 (RO)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Smith, a graphic artist, and Defendants The Education People (“TEP”) and its President Gary Zweig, were formerly parties to an exclusive license agreement under which Smith designed educationally-themed artwork for TEP to use on products (such as pins and the like, sold to teachers, children, parents and so forth), advertised in and sold through TEP catalogs. Plaintiff Smith commenced the instant litigation in 2003, claiming that defendants intentionally — willfully—infringed approximately six different art works of his. On summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Benitez v. KingDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Battagliese Corns v. LaporeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Battagliese Corns v. LaporeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Beedemariam Kassaw v. Wal-Mart CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.