Bank of Monroe v. Gifford
Supreme Court of Iowa
■Appeal from, Jasper Circuit Court. This is an action to recover damages upon an injunction bond. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was sustained. Plaintiffs appeal. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
It appears from tlie averments of the petition that the defendant, Gifford, made a promissory note, and that the plaintiffs were the holders of the same. Gifford claimed that the note was void for some reason, which is not stated, and he commenced an action against the plaintiffs, and procured a temporary injunction restraining them from negotiating, selling, assigning, or indorsing the note. All of the defendants signed the bond required to be given upon the issuance of the inj unction. A motion was made by the plaintiffs herein to dissolve the injunction. A hearing was had on the motion,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dowling v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Penny v. HolbergMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Bemis v. GannettNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Tallahassee Rail Road v. HaywardSupreme Court of Florida · 1852
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scott v. FrankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Jewel Tea Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Lacey v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Kilpatrick v. HaleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
- Kilpatrick v. HaleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.