Dodge v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
APPEAL EROH THE DISTRICT COURT OE RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and authorities for Appellant. I. The evidence is not sufficient to justify the verdict in this case, and that said verdict is against the evidence. II. Error in law occurring- at the time of the trial. III.
Read the full summary
APPEAL EROH THE DISTRICT COURT OE RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and authorities for Appellant. I. The evidence is not sufficient to justify the verdict in this case, and that said verdict is against the evidence. II. Error in law occurring- at the time of the trial. III. Because the answer does not aver that the judgment upon which the execution was issued was, at the time said execution was issued, docketed in the county to the Sheriff of which said execution was directed, but on the contrary states that said execution was issued before such transcript was so docketed or filed, the execution was for…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
Flandrau, J.
The paper hooks in this ease are so defectively prepared that it is very difficult to spell out the exact state of the pleadings and evidence on the trial. The parties have made up a case, and quite a number of amendments have been proposed and adopted. These amendments refer to the original case, in some instances by blank references to the folios and lines. The case as amended has never been engrossed, and we are left to trace it out as best we may. The proper practice would be to send it back for engrossment before considering it, but the fault must rest with -the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Barry v. McGradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Dodge v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Livingstone v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872