Legal Opinion
Kincaid v. Rusk
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 10, 1982No. 78-1822PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Darrell Kincaid seeks declaratory relief and compensatory damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976), for numerous alleged violations of his constitutional rights while he was a pretrial detainee in the custody of appellee Sheriff John Rusk. Kincaid contends, inter alia, that several procedural errors occurred in the course of discovery, that the wrong standards were applied as to certain of the alleged constitutional violations, and that there was an incorrect analysis of Sheriff Rusk’s claimed immunity. We affirm the judgment of the district court denying…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Michael C. Antonelli v. Michael F. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Arlene C. Wolf-Lillie v. Gerald M. Sonquist, Kenosha County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Robert Draper v. Davis S. CoombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- George Parrish and Charles Giles v. Perry Johnson, Charles Anderson, K.L. Cole, and Clarence TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.