Legal Opinion

Butler v. Joy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 20, 2003No. 20980-6-IIIPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

Mary Butler filed suit pro se against Dr. Lori Frank Joy for damages due to negligent medical care. The summons was never properly served. Dr. Joy filed a notice of appearance and moved for summary judgment *293dismissal within a month of the filing of the complaint. This motion did not mention the defect in service of process. Several months later, after the first motion for summary-judgment was voluntarily dismissed, Dr. Joy again moved for summary judgment, this time based on insufficient service of process and expiration of the statute of limitations. Ms. Butler retained new counsel one day…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 31641Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. French v. GabrielWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. King v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Perez-Crisantos v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Qwest Corp. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Qwest Corp. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. BUILDING INDUSTRY ASS'N v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Building Industry Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API