Legal Opinion
Mehrer v. North Ninth Lumber Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
(Three motions.) Defendants move pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the causes of action alleged therein did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of such action.
Plaintiff in the present action seeks damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, who was killed when one of the walls collapsed on a demolition job. Plaintiff’s intestate at the time was an employee of the Parkside Wrecking Company which had been engaged by the defendants, Sadie, Julius and Jacob Rosenwach, to do the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crapo v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Mossip v. F. H. Clement & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Mossip v. F. H. Clement & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Cohen v. SteigmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Leun v. BrimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hughes v. Hinson's Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Mehrer v. North Ninth Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- Prestia v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978