Legal Opinion

R. A. Schoenberg & Co. v. Loftus

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 7, 1904Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Action by R. A. Schoenberg & Co. against William C. Loftus. From an order vacating an order for the examination of defendant before trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

Defendant had appeared in person and by counsel, and submitted to examination, and had answered certain questions. Some questions were objected to, and the examination was adjourned in order that the parties might go before a justice of the court sitting in chambers to obtain rulings upon the objections. On appearing before a justice in chambers, an oral motion was made by defendant’s attorney to vacate the order. The motion was heard and granted, over the objection of plaintiff’s counsel. We think it was error for the court to entertain the motion, for the reason that defendant, without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. German-American Bank v. DorthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API