Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Adato v. Kagan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 29, 1979No. 772, Docket 77-7620Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTimbers, Circuit Judge

Judge Van Graafeiland has written his usual thoughtful, perceptive majority opinion. I agree with it in part and disagree with it in part.

With respect to the federal securities laws claims, I agree with the majority’s reversal of the district court’s dismissal of these claims. I also agree with the majority’s remand of these claims to the district court for trial. But I would reverse and remand — not on the ground urged by the majority, that appellants should be permitted to prove investor intent and knowledge — but on the ground that appellants’ complaint sufficiently states claims for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API