Legal Opinion
Vincent R. Clephas v. Fagelson, Shonberger, Payne & Arthur, a Law Partnership, Doing Business as a Law Firm in Virginia
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1983No. 82-2119PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, Senior District Judge.
Vincent R. Clephas, plaintiff, a resident and it seems, although it is not so alleged, also a citizen of the state of New York, appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’s judgment against him on the merits in an action brought by him against Fagelson, Shonberger, Payne & Arthur which his complaint and amended complaint alike allege is “a law partnership doing business as a law firm in Virginia.” See Complaint, heading and par. 3 (A.3) and Amended Complaint (A.175). On those allegations the plaintiff claimed that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Steelworkers of America v. R. H. Bouligny, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nasser Jaser v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association and Adriano FernandesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Ferrell v. Express Check Advance of SC LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Kathleen Wood v. Crane CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Christopher Roche Juanita Roche v. Lincoln Property Company Swib Investment Company, and Invesco InstitutionalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Jennings v. HCR Manorcare Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.