Legal Opinion

Earnhardt v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Equality among the stockholders of an insolvent building and loan association requires, first, that the solvent credits of the association be collected (thus placing the borrowing and nonborrowing stockholders on a parity), second, that its debts’be paid, and, third, that the balance be distributed according to the respective rights of the parties. Rendleman v. Stoessel, 195 N. C., 640, 143 S. E., 219. This is what the defendants are trying to accord the plaintiffs in the present suit. It is all they are entitled to receive.

But failing in their effort to have the payments made on their stock…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denver First National Bank v. KlugSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Ana Maria Sugar Co. v. QuinonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Rendleman v. . StoesselSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API