Legal Opinion

Fulbany Realty, Inc. v. Perkins

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

Plaintiff mortgagee in this foreclosure action moves to reargue the denial of his application that “ all sums of moneys expended and to be expended by the plaintiff herein, as specified in the annexed affidavit, for the preservation of the * * * mortgaged premises * * * be added to, and become a part of, the amount of the lien of the mortgages * * * be included in the reference to compute herein ”.

From the moving affidavit it appears that the mortgagor on May 10, 1958 executed and delivered an assignment of rents to plaintiff’s designee, one G-reenidge who was appointed collection agent.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Truscott v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Mortimer v. East Side Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Gordon v. KrellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API