Legal Opinion

Anthony Sicari and Esther Sicari v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 27, 1998No. Docket 97-4186PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal concerns the duty of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the “Commissioner”) to use reasonable diligence, when sending a notice of deficiency to a taxpayer, in ascertaining the taxpayer’s “last known address.” A notice sent to such address is a prerequisite to collection of an income tax deficiency, and the mailing of a proper notice starts a 90-day time period in which the taxpayer may challenge the assessment of the deficiency in the Tax Court. Usually, disputes as to whether the required notice was properly addressed concern a taxpayer who has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cool Fuel, Incorporated v. William H. Connett, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Robert F. McPartlin and Geraldine McPartlin v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Makram A. Tadros v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. William J. Crum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. William D. Armstrong v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. Terrell v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Music v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  4. Hynard v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Hunter v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API