Legal Opinion

U.S. Oil Refining & Marketing Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company has a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiff U.S. Oil Refining and Marketing Corp. in an underlying third-party action pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Index Number 87/10192, the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hand, J.), dated April 18, 1990, as declared that it is obligated to defend the plaintiff in the underlying third-party action.

Ordered that the judgment is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goetz v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965
  2. Goetz v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eagle Insurance v. ButtsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Zaccari v. Progressive Northwestern InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. YodiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Empire Insurance v. SchliessmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Allstate Insurance v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API