Legal Opinion

Miller v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 1913No. 8477PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Before Ernest Gary, J., Richland, May, 1913. Action by J. Q. Miller against Seaboard Air Line Railway. Plaintiff appeals. 1 T'homp. on Neg., sec. 968; 61 S. C. 558; 67 S. C. 508; 82 S. C. 324. 67 S. C. 499; 68 S. C. 483; 72 S. C. 389; 82 S. C. 321; 75 S. C. 292; 86 S. C. 106 ; 90 S. C. 331.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an action for damages arising from an injury to the horse of the plaintiff while on a crossing on plaintiff’s land. The crossing was put there by the railroad company. The following is taken from the case:'

“The case came on for trial in the Court of Common Pleas for'Richland county on the 15th day of May, 1912, before his Honor, Judge Ernest Gary, and a jury. It is agreed by counsel that the following is a statement of the testimony:
“Plaintiff and his son testified that at a point about two miles north of Columbia…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moragne v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Eldridge v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hodges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API