Gustafson v. Gatto
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
No argument nor brief for the defendants.
Crosby, J.
This is an action of contract brought against the defendants, husband and wife, to recover for two hothouses purchased from the plaintiff and removed to the premises of the defendant Alma Gatto. They were to be paid for on September 3, 1927, one year after the sale. The price therefor was $425. All the negotiations were with the defendant Thomas Gatto. The defendant Alma Gatto testified that she knew nothing about the negotiations.
They had been partly burned when sold. The plaintiff testified that the defendant Thomas Gatto stated to him that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arnold v. SpurrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Reid v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Dyer v. SwiftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Beston v. AmadonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Westgate v. MunroeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dix Lumber Co. v. GregoryMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1945
- Dix Lumber Co. v. GregoryMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1947
- Ober v. SaxeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1942