Legal Opinion
Farrell v. U.S. Army Brigadier Gen.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 19, 2016No. 15-257PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETZ, Judge.
*65In 2013, a Raleigh police officer pulled over a car driven by Petitioner Peter Farrell. When the officer approached Farrell, he noticed that Farrell's eyes were glassy and bloodshot and that his speech was slightly slurred. The officer returned to his patrol car to wait for backup. When he returned to question Farrell further, the officer noticed a strong odor of mouthwash that wasn't there before, and a nearly empty bottle of mouthwash on the floorboard. The officer asked Farrell if he had just used mouthwash, and Farrell lied and said he had not. As the officer continued to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Grady v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Johnson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Myers-McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- St. John v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. Myers-McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018