Legal Opinion

State v. Rowell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 19, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Donald Rowell was convicted in the District Court (Bangor) of operating a motor vehicle while his license was suspended, a Class D offense. 29 M.R.S.A. § 2184 (Supp.1982-1983). Following an unsuccessful appeal to the Superior Court, he appeals to the Law Court, contending that he was improperly denied his right to a jury trial. We agree.

Defendant contends that he was not informed at his arraignment of his right to a trial by jury as is required by M.D.C. Crim.R. 5(b) and that therefore his failure to demand a jury trial during the 21 days following the arraignment cannot be “deemed”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State v. BoilardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. FrechetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. State v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. State v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. State v. LenfesteySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API