State v. Rowell
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Per curiam
Defendant Donald Rowell was convicted in the District Court (Bangor) of operating a motor vehicle while his license was suspended, a Class D offense. 29 M.R.S.A. § 2184 (Supp.1982-1983). Following an unsuccessful appeal to the Superior Court, he appeals to the Law Court, contending that he was improperly denied his right to a jury trial. We agree.
Defendant contends that he was not informed at his arraignment of his right to a trial by jury as is required by M.D.C. Crim.R. 5(b) and that therefore his failure to demand a jury trial during the 21 days following the arraignment cannot be “deemed”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. BoilardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. FrechetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- State v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- State v. LenfesteySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.