Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Marks

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 19, 1989No. 59,359; ACM 25895Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEverett, Chief Judge

In the supplement to the petition for grant of review, appellant set forth a single issue:

WHETHER THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH THAT APPELLANT ACTED “WILLFULLY AND MALICIOUSLY.”

This was the only issue on which we granted review, and I think it clearly deserves the answer reached by the majority. The evidence showed that the fire had begun in a canvas litter stacked under the stairwell of the Regional Hospital at Maxwell Air Force Base. After initially denying any involvement in the fire, Marks finally made a voluntary statement in which he admitted that he had “held the flame…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Acevedo-VelezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. CaldwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. MarksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API