Legal Opinion

Florida Bar Re Amendment to Integration Rule

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 21, 1981No. 54081PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OVERTON, Justice.

The Florida Bar Board of Governors has petitioned this Court to approve a plan which will allow members of The Florida Bar to become “certified” as having special competence in the areas of taxation and civil trial advocacy. In September, 1979, we rejected the bar’s initial plan but approved lawyer certification in concept. We also suggested that the bar submit a pilot program and requested a recommendation of how certification could operate with the Florida Designation Plan approved by this Court on October 3, 1975. See In re The Florida Bar, 319 So.2d 1 (Fla.1975). We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Matter of the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  5. Florida Bar re Amendment to the Florida Bar Code of Professional ResponsibilitySupreme Court of Florida · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Florida Bar Re Amendment to the Bylaws Under the Integration RuleSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. The Florida Bar re Amendment to the Bylaws Under the Integration RuleSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API