Legal Opinion

Nachbar v. Duncan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 2003No. 25303PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.

Robert Duncan (“Appellant”), appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of Carol Nachbar (“Respondent”), on her claim for replevin and collection following default on certain payments owed by Appellant on promissory notes negotiated by the parties to this action. The trial court ordered Appellant, individually, to pay to Respondent $12,232.04 and later amended the judgment to include an additional $1,000 for attorney fees as provided in the parties’ contract.

In 1999, Appellant and his wife, Kathryn Duncan, responded to a published advertisement by Respondent for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Skidmore v. BackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Massey v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Williams Pipeline Co. v. Allison & Alexander, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Clark v. FitzpatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Dolphin Capital Corp. v. SchroederMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Rice v. Interfood, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API