Legal Opinion
Kluczny v. Matz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 30, 1932No. 28,981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The suit was brought by the present guardian of the estate of Ignatious Chudzik to recover $847 upon a promissory note payable to the “estate of Ignatious Chudzik” and signed by the former guardian, Walter W. Panneck, and the respondent Anthony M. Matz.
Walter W. Panneck was the guardian of the estate of Ignatious Chudzik from February 10, 1914, until his removal April 20, 1931. During that period he received and misappropriated funds belonging to his ward to the amount of $847. It appears that early in 1930 the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jacobson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Hansen v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shields v. Duggan (In Re Dartco, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Bacher v. City Nat. Bk., Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Miller v. Phoenix Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934