Magellan Pipeline Co. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & Regulation
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceZinter, Justice
[¶25.] SDCL 10-45-12.1 is a lengthy listing of sales tax exemptions. The Legislature used different language in the statute to describe two types of exemptions. In the first, the Legislature exempted specifically described “services” performed by “establishments” referenced in the SIC. Representative examples include “health services,” “educational services,” “social services,” “agricultural services,” “forestry services,” and “trucking and courier services.” See SDCL 10-45-12.1.3 In the second, the Legislature more broadly exempted entire “establishments” or “industries.” *408Representative…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graceland College Center for Professional Development & Lifelong Learning, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Sioux Falls Shopping News, Inc. v. Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Cooperative Agronomy Services v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Mauch v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- TRM ATM Corp. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010