Roxford Knitting Co. v. Hamilton Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; James B. Holland, Judge. Action at law by the Hamilton Manufacturing Company against the Roxford Knitting Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error (hereinafter called .the defendant) is a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, and the defendant in error (hereinafter called the plaintiff) is a corporation of the state of Massachusetts. Each of said corporations does business in the state of its origin.
The action in the court below was one of assumpsit, brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for an alleged breach of two contracts for the sale of cotton yarn. One of said contracts was alleged in the *843statement of claim to have been made on the 17th day of May, 1911, for the sale and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- McDonald v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gunderson v. BreyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Lake Transfer Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
- Grainger Bros. v. G. Amsinck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926