In Re Monroe
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDOLPH J. HAINES, Bankruptcy Judge.
James Gagan (“Gagan”) moved to dismiss LaJunta Monroe’s (“Mrs. Monroe”) Chapter 13 bankruptcy case because her debts exceed the limitations of 11 U.S.C. § 109(e). 1 The Court agrees.
Background Facts
The following facts are undisputed.
Gagan invested in Mr. Monroe’s cable television limited partnership. The failure of the partnership led to Gagan’s suit against Mr. Monroe asserting violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gagan v. American Cablevision, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Nicholes v. Johnny Appleseed of Washington (In Re Nicholes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re AdellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Birdsell v. Petersen (In Re Petersen)District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Myers v. U.S. Bank National Bank AssociationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023