Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Carlisle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1986No. 71610PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant brought this legal malpractice action against appellee, alleging that appellee’s representation of him in a criminal matter was negligent because appellee did not disclose that he was, at the same time, the City Attorney for the City of Cairo. This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment to appellee.

1. The trial court’s order granting summary judgment to appellee and denying appellant’s cross-motion for summary judgment recited that the trial court had taken judicial notice of the record of the criminal case in which appellee represented appellant and cited Petkas…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Petkas v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. C & W Land Development Corp. v. KaminskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Yates v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Manderson & Associates, Inc. v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Patterson v. LanhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Roberts v. LangdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Graves v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Taylor v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API