Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anaconda Co. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1977No. TC 991, SC 24690Published

1DissentHowell, J.

We are not involved in this suit with whether or not Anaconda owed corporate excise taxes for the years involved. That issue was not raised in the pleadings and does not appear to be an issue in the briefs.1 The sole issue is whether the deficiency assessment made by the Department of Revenue is void for procedural reasons. The majority opinion finds that it is void because the defendant failed to comply with one of the provisions of ORS 314.405 which provides that, upon request, the taxpayer "shall have an opportunity to confer with the department or its delegate as to the proposed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Childs v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Crocker v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
  3. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Warm Springs Lumber Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API