Legal Opinion

Blasinay v. Albert Wenzlick Real Estate Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, P. J.

This ease was heretofore determined by this court by an opinion handed down “on January 9, 1940. Thereafter, on motion of respondent a rehearing was granted, and the cause was further briefed and reargued. After careful consideration and research we find no reason to change our original opinion, and it is now submitted with additions thereto as follows:

This is an action in tort by which plaintiff seeks to recover damages alleged to have been, sustained by her by the fraud and misrepresentation of the Albert Wenzlick Real Estate Company, through its agents, Albert Wenzlick and Jay Yohe. All…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. HarbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manson v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Roughton Pontiac Corp. v. AlstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Kuhn v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952
  4. Benson v. Jim Maddox Northwest Imports, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Employers Casualty Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API