Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Richter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The six Judges who decided this case being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

PRICE, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance in which JACOBS, President Judge, and VAN der VOORT, J., join. SPAETH, J., files an opinion in support of remand in which HOFFMAN and CERCONE, JJ., join. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

PRICE, Judge:

Appellant contends that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a jury trial, that he did not consent to the incorporation of the record of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. CatheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. SchrothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. MimmsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TeganoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API