Tananta v. Cruise Ships Catering & Services Int'l., N.V.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceSchwartz, Chief Judge
(specially concurring).
I concur in the result and virtually all of the majority opinion. With respect to part IV, however, I think it sufficient to make it clear that, although Henry v. Windjammer Barefoot Cruises, 851 So.2d 731 (Fla. 8d DCA 2003) formally adopts Fantome, S.A. v. Frederick, 2003 WL 23009844 (11th Cir. January 24, 2003), the reasoning and outcome are also entirely correct under Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996). To my mind, while it is technically more accurate to specify, as in Guerra v. Selsdon Maritime Corp., 711 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 3d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Williams v. Cruise Ships Catering and Service International, NVDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Guerra v. Selsdon Maritime Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Henry v. Windjammer Barefoot CruisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Membreño v. Costa Crociere, S.P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004