Legal Opinion
The Kendall Company v. Progressive Medical Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 4, 1996No. 95-1444PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
The Kendall Company appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan granting summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Progressive Medical Technology, Inc. Kendall Co. v. Progressive Medical Technology, Inc., No. 5:93-CV-89 (W.D. Mich. June 12, 1995). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Kendall is the assignee of U.S. Patent 4,253,449, directed to a medical device for applying compressive pressure to a patient’s limbs in order to increase blood flow and treat or prevent deep vein thrombosis. The patented device is comprised of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Hewlett-Packard Company v. Repeat-O-Type Stencil Manufacturing Corporation, Inc. And Fred KeenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- R2 Medical Systems, Inc. v. Katecho, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd. v. Jazz Photo Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.